Usuari:KRLS/TR/fr

De Viquip??dia

This is a survey for my Research Project with aim to know the indicators that measure the quality of an article according to the wikipedist community. If you want to answer this survey, just follow the link EDIT, copy and paste the pattern below, paste it in the end and answer the questions. I need tour help! I???m in a hurry so please; answer it as soon as you can.

Attention: Please, do not edit the pattern, just copy and paste in the bottom of the page and answer following the pertinent indications with (<-- -->).

If you have a problem with some questions you can say me your problems in my talk.

[edita] Template

[edita] fr:User:

• Country:
• Age:
• Sex:

1. You have to fill the following table just with a number from 0 to 10, according to how much you agree with the sentence. 0 means you totally disagree and 10 you totally agree.

Quality indicator	Your qualification from 0 to 10
1. The number of articles.
2. The size of a wikipedia article.
3. The number of users.
4. Number of active users.
5. The speed of the vandalisms reversions.
6. Number of edits for article
7. The number of maintenance templates
8. Number of articles with a maintenance templates
9. Number of users that contribute with the wikipedia maintenance
10. References of external sources.
11. Projects to improve it's quality[1]
12. Community contributions to this projects[2]
13. Number of quality articles, good articles...
14. Number of visitors of a wikipedia.[3]
15. Structure of the categories.[4]
16. Redaction and clarity of the articles.
17. Existence of images at wikipedia articles.
18. Are most of your articles at an ordinary encyclopedia?[5]
19. Variety of terms (not included at ordinary encyclopedias).
20. External links to help visitors find more information.

1. Are there other quality indicators? Which:

[edita] Answers

---

[edita] MGuf

• Country:France
• Age:42
• Sex:M??le

1. You have to fill the following table just with a number from 0 to 10, according to how much you agree with the sentence. 0 means you totally disagree and 10 you totally agree.

Quality indicator	Your qualification from 0 to 10
1. The number of articles.	6
2. The size of a wikipedia article.	5
3. The number of users.	4
4. Number of active users.	7
5. The speed of the vandalisms reversions.	9
6. Number of edits for article	6
7. The number of maintenance templates / Nombre de mod??les de maintenance	pas compris
8. Number of articles with a maintenance templates / Nombre d'articles contenant un mod??le de maintenance	pas compris
9. Number of users that contribute with the wikipedia maintenance /	6
10. References of external sources.	8
11. Projects to improve it's quality[6]	4
12. Community contributions to this projects[7]	6
13. Number of quality articles, good articles...	6
14. Number of visitors of a wikipedia.[8]	4
15. Structure of the categories.[9]	7
16. Redaction and clarity of the articles.	8
17. Existence of images at wikipedia articles.	6
18. Are most of your articles at an ordinary encyclopedia?[10]	pas compris
19. Variety of terms (not included at ordinary encyclopedias).	7
20. External links to help visitors find more information.	4

1. Are there other quality indicators? Which:

---

[edita] Comments

1. ??? A sample could be: List of articles every Wikipedia should have
2. ??? Projects referred on point 11.
3. ??? This means that people believes in the wikipedia content.
4. ??? The order and the way to find articles at their category.
5. ??? Ordinary encyclopedias: Enncyclopedia Britannica.
6. ??? A sample could be: List of articles every Wikipedia should have
7. ??? Projects referred on point 11.
8. ??? This means that people believes in the wikipedia content.
9. ??? The order and the way to find articles at their category.
10. ??? Ordinary encyclopedias: Enncyclopedia Britannica.